ALIENS
-
Yeah, right, and the doughnuts are always their front side (with the hole) to the camera? Its 2 dimensional shit! Or its just a microscope shot of the some bacteria shit.
I mean that the space is like 3 dimensional. And like this vid suck a huge cock.
No? -
first off, these exact discs are found in numerous space videos from all kinds of sources(you would know if you ever did research)
"></a><!-- m --> ), but even a mask-effect wouldn't explain a hole in the middle
second, if you open your eyes and actually watch the full video you will see that they're not always facing the camera, some them are actually rotating(hard to tell but they change shapes), but because of their weird ass shape and light reflecting/emitting nature it's hard to always tell
i thought that it's weird that they all look like they're facing the camera, so i thought maybe it's something like a mask illusion( <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="
and then it hit me, they're actually just rotating really fast, which would explain the pulsating, and the "2D" look, and as seen in some videos, the occasional shape-shifting into a much smaller, almost invisible object(as seen in the fox video). in fact i'd bet money on fast rotation, it explains it perfectly.. unless you got a better hypothesis<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="
"></a><!-- m --> - 30-36 fairly clear shot + that shit's seen every few seconds throughout the whole video
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href=""></a><!-- m --> - just listen to the instructor, later on in the video you'll see what they're talking about(they pulsate too)
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href=""></a><!-- m --> - @3 min, @4:20(sideways)**
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href=""></a><!-- m --> 0:55-1:20 exactly, absolutely, identically, equivalent, matching, alike, impossible to tell apart, the same, twin object on the fucking NEWS and out of all the news channel it's fucking FOX NEWS
oh shit, i kinda wanted to say that if you make me repeat what i already posted im gonna have to slap you, but after going back i noticed that i completely fucked up the link and instead of the link to that ^ video i double posted the Buzz Aldrin link@"Illidan":
i mean come on.. the fucking crew themselves reported this shit publiclyhow the fuck is this still not a known fact?
"> ... re=related</a><!-- m -->
jesus..
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="and then the shit's on FOX NEWS? holy mother of christ the son of god the bearer of our sins cum on my face and call me batman how the fuck do people ignore EVEN THIS?..
"></a><!-- m --> (fixed)
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="1:23-1:39
Over the years we have chased many, many, many of these things, maybe not with the visibility that this one has gotten. And rarely have they ever been able to pinpoint exactly where they came from and always finding out that they didn't pose us any hazard.look at his face, lmao, im not sure if he's thinking "fuck fuck fuck i dont wanna get fired", "i cant believe im reading this bullshit" or, this is prolly the winner, "Who the fuck wrote this shit? Do they not realize this is admitting that, first of all, we CHASED these things as well as the fact that you don't need to explain the origin and threat assessment for spacejunk, furthermore admitting the existence of UFOs and finishing the whole speech with "didn't pose us any hazard" equals to screaming "Them be extra terrestrials, alright? They're here, mkay? In our space, got it? Interacting with us for many, many years, cool?" Waait a minute, I wrote this.. fuck, fuck, fuck, I really hope I don't get fired.." -
first off, these exact discs are found in numerous space videos from all kinds of sources(you would know if you ever did research)
"></a><!-- m --> ), but even a mask-effect wouldn't explain a hole in the middle
second, if you open your eyes and actually watch the full video you will see that they're not always facing the camera, some them are actually rotating(hard to tell but they change shapes), but because of their weird ass shape and light reflecting/emitting nature it's hard to always tell
i thought that it's weird that they all look like they're facing the camera, so i thought maybe it's something like a mask illusion( <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="
and then it hit me, they're actually just rotating really fast, which would explain the pulsating, and the "2D" look, and as seen in some videos, the occasional shape-shifting into a much smaller, almost invisible object(as seen in the fox video). in fact i'd bet money on fast rotation, it explains it perfectly.. unless you got a better hypothesis<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="
"></a><!-- m --> - 30-36 fairly clear shot + that shit's seen every few seconds throughout the whole video
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href=""></a><!-- m --> - just listen to the instructor, later on in the video you'll see what they're talking about(they pulsate too)
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href=""></a><!-- m --> - @3 min, @4:20(sideways)**
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href=""></a><!-- m --> 0:55-1:20 exactly, absolutely, identically, equivalent, matching, alike, impossible to tell apart, the same, twin object on the fucking NEWS and out of all the news channel it's fucking FOX NEWS
oh shit, i kinda wanted to say that if you make me repeat what i already posted im gonna have to slap you, but after going back i noticed that i completely fucked up the link and instead of the link to that ^ video i double posted the Buzz Aldrin link@"Illidan":
i mean come on.. the fucking crew themselves reported this shit publiclyhow the fuck is this still not a known fact?
"> ... re=related</a><!-- m -->
jesus..
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="and then the shit's on FOX NEWS? holy mother of christ the son of god the bearer of our sins cum on my face and call me batman how the fuck do people ignore EVEN THIS?..
"></a><!-- m --> (fixed)
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="1:23-1:39
Over the years we have chased many, many, many of these things, maybe not with the visibility that this one has gotten. And rarely have they ever been able to pinpoint exactly where they came from and always finding out that they didn't pose us any hazard.look at his face, lmao, im not sure if he's thinking "fuck fuck fuck i dont wanna get fired", "i cant believe im reading this bullshit" or, this is prolly the winner, "Who the fuck wrote this shit? Do they not realize this is admitting that, first of all, we CHASED these things as well as the fact that you don't need to explain the origin and threat assessment for spacejunk, furthermore admitting the existence of UFOs and finishing the whole speech with "didn't pose us any hazard" equals to screaming "Them be extra terrestrials, alright? They're here, mkay? In our space, got it? Interacting with us for many, many years, cool?" Waait a minute, I wrote this.. fuck, fuck, fuck, I really hope I don't get fired.." -
/care
-
/care
-
but yeah, priest is right, who cares if the whole world is being lied to about the history of our planet? it's not like religion wouldn't get anally fucked if this was official, no matter how the Vatican tried to ease it's way into extra-terrestrial life, 4 times. who cares if we could be travelling from Toronto to Tokyo for the cost of a bus ticket if we could openly work on advanced technology, right? it's not like we're shitting all over the planet. who cares if Earth can't sustain a 7 billion population of carbon-pollution dependent humans, amirite? it's not like millions upon millions of years of evolution are getting anally raped so fast that even 1% of the time it took for all these awesome things to evolve will be enough to devolve
and it's totally insignificant that we're killing ourselves simply because the military industrial complex wants to make money off war and oil while for a very long time we could have been using superior energy sources
/care -
but yeah, priest is right, who cares if the whole world is being lied to about the history of our planet? it's not like religion wouldn't get anally fucked if this was official, no matter how the Vatican tried to ease it's way into extra-terrestrial life, 4 times. who cares if we could be travelling from Toronto to Tokyo for the cost of a bus ticket if we could openly work on advanced technology, right? it's not like we're shitting all over the planet. who cares if Earth can't sustain a 7 billion population of carbon-pollution dependent humans, amirite? it's not like millions upon millions of years of evolution are getting anally raped so fast that even 1% of the time it took for all these awesome things to evolve will be enough to devolve
and it's totally insignificant that we're killing ourselves simply because the military industrial complex wants to make money off war and oil while for a very long time we could have been using superior energy sources
/care -
fun statistic actually, took my by surprise, i thought way more people were uninformed
over 50% of people believe that we have been visited and/or still are being visited, while over 80% believe that we've at least been visited in ancient times
not sure how accurate these statistics are, the 80% is from a more or less shady source, the 50% is from History channel -
fun statistic actually, took my by surprise, i thought way more people were uninformed
over 50% of people believe that we have been visited and/or still are being visited, while over 80% believe that we've at least been visited in ancient times
not sure how accurate these statistics are, the 80% is from a more or less shady source, the 50% is from History channel -
80% too high imo. g-d knows what the fuck is this shit.
Religion and its breed never ever stayed close to the advantages of the alien technology. So I dont think its the real reason of silence.
Interesting theory bout ufos, but they are traveling only horizontally and vertically. Again, its a 3D! Its not like iam trolling u, but...
And their path is simple: from A to B. -
80% too high imo. g-d knows what the fuck is this shit.
Religion and its breed never ever stayed close to the advantages of the alien technology. So I dont think its the real reason of silence.
Interesting theory bout ufos, but they are traveling only horizontally and vertically. Again, its a 3D! Its not like iam trolling u, but...
And their path is simple: from A to B. -
по-русске, товарисчь, русске
конечно причина секретности не религия, причина - деньги и технологии, которыми они не хотят делиться, ведь им давно не нужна нефть для передвижения, но с нефти ещё можно сделать очень много денег и пока нефть не начнёт кончаться они будут стараться скрывать из последних сил
а на счёт горизонтально и вертикально, тебе 3д очки нужны? они во все стороны летают, не всегда в глаза бросается, но видно. качество не достаточно высокое чтоб точно заметить когда размер увеличивается или уменьшается, но камера зумит далеко, чтоб в глаза бросалось приближение/удаление они должны вокруг камеры летать, но им пофиг на камеру, электричеством пережённый кабель несколько километров от камеры им куда более интересен
3:18-3:30 в нижней части более-менее видно как аркой приблежается/удаляется, всё перечислять не буду, там достаточно где видно... каким словом можно заменить "приближение/удаление"? =\ -
по-русске, товарисчь, русске
конечно причина секретности не религия, причина - деньги и технологии, которыми они не хотят делиться, ведь им давно не нужна нефть для передвижения, но с нефти ещё можно сделать очень много денег и пока нефть не начнёт кончаться они будут стараться скрывать из последних сил
а на счёт горизонтально и вертикально, тебе 3д очки нужны? они во все стороны летают, не всегда в глаза бросается, но видно. качество не достаточно высокое чтоб точно заметить когда размер увеличивается или уменьшается, но камера зумит далеко, чтоб в глаза бросалось приближение/удаление они должны вокруг камеры летать, но им пофиг на камеру, электричеством пережённый кабель несколько километров от камеры им куда более интересен
3:18-3:30 в нижней части более-менее видно как аркой приблежается/удаляется, всё перечислять не буду, там достаточно где видно... каким словом можно заменить "приближение/удаление"? =\ -
@Illidan:
каким словом можно заменить "приближение/удаление"? =
трансфокация -
@Illidan:
каким словом можно заменить "приближение/удаление"? =
трансфокация -
[тут должна была быть иконка лампочки, но гугль нашёл прищельцолампу]
там достаточно где винда трансфокация!
-
[тут должна была быть иконка лампочки, но гугль нашёл прищельцолампу]
там достаточно где винда трансфокация! -
so i watched Discovery Channel's "Into the Universe with Stephen Hawking" episode 1: The Aliens
жаль что он зассал говорить о настоящих приходах, хотя эпизод отличный(подсказал как добывать достаточно энергии для вормхолов, до чего я особо не додумывался, тк думал что на много больше пришлось бы добыть), он напомнил о сигнале который мы получили, затем добавил что сигналу пришлось бы лететь примерно 200 лет, за которое время та цевилизация себя могла уже замочить
но думаю он не знал о disclosure проэкте, еслиб ему просто запретили говорить о настоящих прищельцах - он бы подмекнул как-нить, разве что мб я не фтыкнул в намёк, но имхо он просто не знал, жаль. =
но, вопрос, еслиб он знал - человеку с его статусом разрешили бы рассказывать об этом на BBC? -
so i watched Discovery Channel's "Into the Universe with Stephen Hawking" episode 1: The Aliens
жаль что он зассал говорить о настоящих приходах, хотя эпизод отличный(подсказал как добывать достаточно энергии для вормхолов, до чего я особо не додумывался, тк думал что на много больше пришлось бы добыть), он напомнил о сигнале который мы получили, затем добавил что сигналу пришлось бы лететь примерно 200 лет, за которое время та цевилизация себя могла уже замочить
но думаю он не знал о disclosure проэкте, еслиб ему просто запретили говорить о настоящих прищельцах - он бы подмекнул как-нить, разве что мб я не фтыкнул в намёк, но имхо он просто не знал, жаль. =
но, вопрос, еслиб он знал - человеку с его статусом разрешили бы рассказывать об этом на BBC? -
what? medvedev asked about alien abduction? у вас на новостях что об этом говорят?
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8662822.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8662822.stm</a><!-- m -->
